ICE forced to step up deportations



Joe Guzzardi

Last week, California Gov. Jerry Brown signed the California Values Act, or Senate Bill 54, which officially made the state an illegal alien sanctuary.

Brown’s signature was never doubted. During his many immigration speeches, the governor has always staunchly defended illegal aliens, and on one occasion invited every Mexican national to come to California. “You are all welcome in California,” Brown told an assembled group. “Permission,” as Brown put it, isn’t a requirement.

During his administration, Brown signed 11 bills that, among them, allowed illegal immigrants to obtain drivers licenses, and qualify for professional business licenses. Brown also signed the Trust Act that offered then-unprecedented protections to illegal immigrants.

Brown and California Senate Pro Tempore president Kevin de Leon, the bill’s author, infer the White House’s vows to uphold immigration laws target kindly grandmothers, nannies and gardeners. The truth, however, is that because the state sanctuary law severely limits cooperation between local jurisdictions and Immigration and Customs Enforcement, murderers, rapists, child molesters and other convicted felons have been and will continue to be set free.

A 2016 Senate Judiciary review of ICE data showed that since 2010, released criminal aliens have committed or attempted to commit more than 130 murders. From fiscal 2013-15, ICE admitted the agency released 86,288 dangerous criminals. A subsequent Boston Globe analysis found recidivism among criminal aliens may reach 30 percent.

Now that S.B. 54 is state law, Brown and his Sacramento acolytes are doing victory laps. At the signing ceremony, Brown made it clear his priority is “to bring a measure of comfort” to aliens, public safety be damned.

The question today is what action the Trump administration, and specifically ICE, might take on behalf of law-abiding and legal residents.

Although few would know it after listening to Brown, California’s legal immigrants outnumber illegal aliens by a 13:1 ratio. That’s approximately 36 million legal residents compared to an estimated 3 million aliens.

Acting ICE director Tom Homan told the media that in response to what he called Brown’s decision to “undermine public safety and hinder ICE from performing its federally mandated mission,” his agents have “no choice but to conduct at-large arrests in local neighborhoods and at worksites.”

Instead of focusing on arrests at jails and prisons, ICE’s at-large actions will result in collateral, non-targeted alien arrests. In short, Homan promises more arrests.

A 2016 USC-Dornsife/Los Angeles Times poll found 62 percent of likely voters agreed that illegal immigration in California is “at least a major problem.” Had participants been asked their opinions about criminal illegal aliens, those that expressed dissatisfaction would have been significantly higher.

An earlier poll, taken in 2015 by the U.C.-Berkeley Institute of Governmental Studies, showed the popularity of sanctuary cities was less favorable than illegal immigration.

By wide margins, Californians disapprove of sanctuary cities: Republicans, 82 percent; Democrats, 73 percent; Independents, 71 percent, Asian and African-Americans, 75 percent, and Latinos, 65 percent.

Brown’s bombast plays well with immigration advocates and ethnic identity politicians. But everyday Californians — the taxpayers — know that sanctuary, no matter how it’s sugar-coated, protects criminals and is an indefensible public policy.

They’re rooting for Homan.

— Joe Guzzardi is a Californians for Population Stabilization Senior Writing Fellow. Contact him at


Comments are subject to moderator review and may not appear immediately on the site.

Please read our commenting policy before posting.

Any comment violating the site's commenting guidelines will be removed and the user could be banned from the site.

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Sign in to comment